Can Western Science Be Value-free?

Name of StudentTitle of Subject : Can Western wisdom be quantify-freeName of ProfessorDateAbstr dallyThis tackles the question of whether Western science is encourage free , maintaining the topographic point that it is not . Considering science in general at initial , it introduces Wittgenstein s views on the , and shows the unavoidable influence of language on the rumination of science , whence the influx of cultural value . The closed book of language appears in its most extreme form when practice to quantum mechanics . It then goes on to explore the specific set that underlie Western science . The analyses of Kant , Nietzsche and Weber ar presented in to demonstrate that Western science has a background and value system deriving from ChristianityAccording to the Austrian philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein , any propositi on we trip out claiming to be science will in feature be nothing more than a play with terminology . twain philosophy is a `critique of language he says (2001 ,. 23 . If we accept this view , than the practice of science bear both be for mere amusement , or else it must hunt a place to it prior to taking up the try , because if it is not for amusement the scientific story , which we take to to shit to at the end of our investigation , must be forebode service some other covert purpose . In either case , science is no more value-free . Scientists who avow to a philosophy of positivism will claim that this ulterior purpose is other than the acquisition of ultimate truth . further such truth cannot be had through the word games of Wittgenstein . And of shape positivism is itself a value . This philosophy does not traverse the fact that scientific propositions are then word games , solely hitherto insists that enquiry should not be abandoned , and indeed should be limited to only such questions tha! t promise domineering and lucid answers .

Most scientists seem to have a surface foundation of what constitutes autocratic science . It would generally be concur that to measure the elasticity of a solid substance is positive science . But quantum physics intervenes to tell us that we cannot hope to fudge the exact linear measurements necessary in such a labor movement , so that even here we are not free from ambiguity . Therefore the choice that the incontrovertible makes is value-laden tooNiels Bohr , who was submissive in the formation of quantum physics also complained ab let on the linguistic obstacleIt is wrong to calculate that the task of physics is to find out how temperament is . Physics concerns what we can say about nature . What is it that we humans depend on ? We depend on our words (cited in Pais 2000 ,. 24The language at his disposal , he insisted , was inadequate to explain quantum phenomena . It constrained him to think in terms of the percipient and the observed , and any statement involving such led to conundrum . It was as if the very act of observing brought the object into human beings which prior to the act of reflexion was a wave function...If you regard to get a dear essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay