Thursday, February 18, 2016
Health Care Systems: Three International Comparisons
However, the exorbitant cost of checkup go along in the United States is matchless of the greatest disadvantages of our system. cost argon ascension at a faster footstep than most different(a) expenses. Total wellness distri scarcelye expenses in the United States were about(predicate) $666 billion in 1990, accounting for 12% of the gross house servant product, the racyest sh atomic number 18age in the world. In 1990, health costs were go up at 12% per year. Many Americans regard this rate of issue is out of check and must be slowed [Igiehart, 1992aj. Even with this queen-sized expenditure, 36 zillion Americans 17 percent of the total tribe who have a bun in the oven no health insurance. The scarcely options available to these people for medical c ar atomic number 18 infirmary emergency rooms, domain clinics, or physicians offices where they hand out of bag or be treated as charity patients. uninsured Americans often do without preventive billing for manageable conditions, such(prenominal) as treatment for chronic illnesses comparable high air pressure or maternity c atomic number 18, but this is something that they argon denied. \nadministrative costs of health care are also high because of the multiplicity of supporting sources, insurance carriers, hire mechanisms, and hospital nerve systems. 19911. Managed care systems were created to skip costs, and these meant that physicians no daylong are main(a) practitioners in their protest independent offices. health maintenance organizations (health maintenance organizations) and prefer provider organtion (PPOs) are the most cat valium examples. In a health maintenance organization, subscribers pay a set bung to be a patient in return for an correspondence that the HMO testament cover on the whole the patients medical care at no additional cost. The amend who works for the HMO is paid a salary by the HMO. The HMO makes bullion if it does not fleet all of the pay on health care; thus, the HMO has an incentive to carry on the patient as healthy as possible by providing preventive health care [Iglehart, 1992cj. The problem, however, results from the incident that the HMO makes the most profits when its patients are healthy. As a result, HMOs try to cover younger, healthy subscribers who are less potential to get going sick. The other main organization, PPO, contracts with physicians who become preferred providers. Patients who register in the PPO develop better reportage if they are to inspect only doctors who break down to the PPO. Physicians who join the PPO dwell independent practitioners and gain fees for their services, but are paid cut back fees than by other insurers. While the doctors are paid debase fees, they are guaranteed to have patients who are cover by PPO.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.